At one company, results depend on who runs the AI. Ask DoorDash baskets run nearly 50% larger, while early outside-agent baskets were reportedly two-thirds smaller.
Order food through a chatbot: 10 AI ways ranked, 2026
DoorDash's own chatbot builds grocery baskets nearly 50% bigger than usual, while early orders from outside AI agents reportedly came in about two-thirds smaller.
- No. 1: Ask DoorDash in-app chatbot
- 10 places
01Final list
The leading AIs built their own top-ten lists independently. Above is one combined result that is easy to check: every place has a reason, the AIs that included it and, where the AIs gave one, a source.
Order: from most to least AI agreement.
A bright badge means this AI put the entry on its list. A dim badge means it did not.
- 1
Ask DoorDash in-app chatbot
Grocery carts run nearly 50% bigger than the same shoppers' usual orders and are built 5x faster. These are DoorDash's own figures, and it gives no share of orders.
Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek, MiMo, Qwen. Did not include: Nova, Wenxin.In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Grok: see list · Gemini: see list · Kimi: 4 · DeepSeek: see list · MiMo: see list · Qwen: see list
What each AI noted 8
- Claude
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - ChatGPT
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Grok
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Gemini
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Kimiplace 4
DoorDash's own chatbot grows grocery baskets ~50% while outside agents shrink them by two-thirds — same task, opposite trust.
Source ↗ - DeepSeek
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - MiMo
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Qwen
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list
8 AIs put it here - 2
AI chatbot recommends, you buy on the store's site (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity referrals)
Adobe says AI-referred visitors converted 90% better and spent 83% more per visit in September 2026. Adobe's own Q3 PDF header says the conversion gap has disappeared.
Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek, MiMo, Qwen. Did not include: Nova, Wenxin.In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: 3 · Grok: 3 · Gemini: see list · Kimi: see list · DeepSeek: 4 · MiMo: see list · Qwen: 7
What each AI noted 8
- Claude
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - ChatGPTplace 3
70% express interest in AI travel planning, but planning a trip is not the same as trusting an agent to buy a nonrefundable ticket.
- Grokplace 3
Nearly half of Ask DoorDash restaurant orders go to places the user never tried
Source ↗ - Gemini
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Kimi
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - DeepSeekplace 4
AI-referred retail traffic converts 90% better and yields 83% more revenue per visit, but only 23% trust GenAI to pay.
- MiMo
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Qwenplace 7
More than half (52.3%) of consumers prefer keeping their card outside the AI app entirely, fearing the cost of a security breach.
8 AIs put it here - 3
DoorDash text ordering in Apple Messages
It launched Sept 30 to a 20,000-user US pilot. In Bloomberg's testing it quoted prices that differed from the app, and no basket data has been released.
Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek, MiMo, Qwen. Did not include: Nova, Wenxin.In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Grok: see list · Gemini: see list · Kimi: see list · DeepSeek: see list · MiMo: see list · Qwen: see list
What each AI noted 8
- Claude
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - ChatGPT
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Grok
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Gemini
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Kimi
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - DeepSeek
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - MiMo
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Qwen
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list
8 AIs put it here - 4
Outside AI agents ordering on DoorDash (Muse, Instinct, Fo)
Several hundred orders in total, against 993 million DoorDash orders in Q3. One analyst note says early baskets were two-thirds smaller; DoorDash has not confirmed it.
Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek, MiMo, Qwen. Did not include: Nova, Wenxin.In their lists: Claude: 7 · ChatGPT: 7 · Grok: see list · Gemini: see list · Kimi: 9 · DeepSeek: 3 · MiMo: 7 · Qwen: 4
What each AI noted 8
- Claudeplace 7
Several hundred orders in total shows the demand, or the trust, is not there yet.
Source ↗ - ChatGPTplace 7
DoorDash's outside agents completed only several hundred orders, despite the platform processing 993 million orders in Q3: the missing ingredient is adoption, not just menu navigation.
Source ↗ - Grok
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Gemini
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Kimiplace 9
DoorDash's real-world test: several hundred agent orders versus its ~3 million daily deliveries — a rounding error with pepperoni.
Source ↗ - DeepSeekplace 3
Agents solve about 74% of WebArena ordering tasks, but outside agents placed only several hundred orders against 993 million DoorDash orders.
Source ↗ - MiMoplace 7
Agents can pass the shopping tests and still barely show up: 'several hundred' real agent orders against 993 million human ones in one quarter.
Source ↗ - Qwenplace 4
Passed simulated tests, but DoorDash saw only 'several hundred' actual orders from them in Q3 2026, showing low real-world trust.
Source ↗
8 AIs put it here - 5
Grocery cart assistants (Instacart Cart Assistant, Uber Eats)
Instacart says Cart Assistant orders already beat its $115 average order. Uber Eats builds a cart from a photo of your list, and you still review every item.
Included it: Claude, Grok, Gemini, Nova, DeepSeek, Wenxin, MiMo. Did not include: ChatGPT, Kimi, Qwen.In their lists: Claude: 3 · Grok: see list · Gemini: 4 · Nova: see list · DeepSeek: 2 · Wenxin: 2 · MiMo: 3
What each AI noted 7
- Claudeplace 3
Ask DoorDash builds a cart in under two minutes, and the person still presses buy.
- Grok
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Geminiplace 4
Agents score 53% accuracy on multi-item lists, but 71% of shoppers insist on 1-click manual review before cards get charged.
- Nova
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - DeepSeekplace 2
Cart Assistant orders beat Instacart's $115 average order, yet only 28% of adults are comfortable letting AI buy groceries.
- Wenxinplace 2
One-tap 'order again' works 92% of the time — and AI picks what you liked
- MiMoplace 3
The test the agents don't just pass but overshoot: carts they build run ~50% larger than the shopper's own.
Source ↗
7 AIs put it here - 6
Amazon Rufus / Alexa for Shopping
Amazon reports 250M+ users, the widest reach of any AI ordering route; other trackers say 300M–400M. Users were 60% likelier to buy, but Amazon gives no share of orders.
Included it: ChatGPT, Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek, MiMo, Qwen. Did not include: Claude, Grok, Nova, Wenxin.In their lists: ChatGPT: 2 · Gemini: see list · Kimi: see list · DeepSeek: 7 · MiMo: see list · Qwen: see list
What each AI noted 6
- ChatGPTplace 2
Amazon reports more than 250 million assistant users and over 60% higher purchase likelihood, making recommendation assistance far more established than autonomous checkout.
Source ↗ - Gemini
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Kimi
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - DeepSeekplace 7
44% would trust an AI to choose gifts, a higher trust level than letting it pay for them.
- MiMo
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Qwen
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list
6 AIs put it here - 7
Alexa+ voice ordering from Uber Eats and Grubhub
Shopping chats on Alexa+ led to 3x the on-device purchases of classic Alexa. Food ordering needs linked accounts, and no order count is published.
Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Nova, Wenxin, MiMo. Did not include: Grok, Kimi, DeepSeek, Qwen.In their lists: Claude: 5 · ChatGPT: see list · Gemini: see list · Nova: 6 · Wenxin: see list · MiMo: see list
What each AI noted 6
- Claudeplace 5
Alexa+ syncs past orders, so the AI repeats what you already trust.
Source ↗ - ChatGPT
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Gemini
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Novaplace 6
79% office-order success but 40% need manager approval
- Wenxin
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - MiMo
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list
6 AIs put it here - 8
Walmart Sparky in-app assistant
About half of Walmart app users have tried it, and they spend about 35% more per order (single source). Walmart's own checkout inside ChatGPT sold poorly.
Included it: ChatGPT, Nova, DeepSeek, Wenxin, MiMo. Did not include: Claude, Grok, Gemini, Kimi, Qwen.In their lists: ChatGPT: see list · Nova: see list · DeepSeek: see list · Wenxin: see list · MiMo: see list
What each AI noted 5
- ChatGPT
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Nova
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - DeepSeek
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Wenxin
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - MiMo
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list
5 AIs put it hereno source given - 9
Drive-thru voice AI ordering (Taco Bell, Wendy's, McDonald's)
It was 90.8% accurate in 2026 mystery shops, beating 86.7% at staffed lanes. Still, 29% repeated part of their order, and it appeared at under 2% of visits.
Included it: Gemini, Kimi, DeepSeek, MiMo. Did not include: Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Nova, Wenxin, Qwen.In their lists: Gemini: see list · Kimi: 8 · DeepSeek: 10 · MiMo: 5
What each AI noted 4
- Gemini
Named differently in its own list: open the full list.
see list - Kimiplace 8
Operator passes 61% of live-web purchase-style tasks — yet only 11% of consumers have ever actually bought something inside an AI tool.
Source ↗ - DeepSeekplace 10
TravelPlanner's best agent passes 44% of constrained trips; only 12% of consumers are comfortable booking without final approval.
- MiMoplace 5
A 90.8% benchmark pass rate sounds wonderful until you remember the 'test' is somebody's dinner: 29% still have to repeat part of their order.
Source ↗
4 AIs put it here - 10
Checkout inside a chatbot (ChatGPT Instant Checkout, Copilot Checkout)
Walmart put about 200,000 products into ChatGPT checkout and called sales disappointing. Microsoft says Copilot Checkout users are 53% likelier to buy, a company claim.
Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Kimi, DeepSeek. Did not include: Grok, Gemini, Nova, Wenxin, MiMo, Qwen.In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Kimi: see list · DeepSeek: see list
4 AIs put it here
02Worth knowing
What the AIs noticed while building the list.
Drive-thru voice AI now beats staffed lanes on accuracy (90.8% vs 86.7%), yet mystery shoppers met it on under 2% of visits. 'Hundreds of locations' and what guests actually experience barely overlap.
Walmart's disappointing ChatGPT checkout pushed it toward putting its own Sparky assistant inside outside chatbots. Moving the pay button into a chatbot did not by itself bring sales.
While reporting only several hundred outside-agent orders, DoorDash runs four AI routes of its own: the Ask DoorDash chatbot, a CLI, text ordering and a corporate connector.
03How we counted
In plain words, no formulas.
1The question
Top 10 Ways to Order With AI, Ranked by How Much Each Actually Gets Used and Trusted
2Why this topic
It shows the reader that at the same company, results depend on who runs the AI, the platform itself or an outsider. No single report ranks the routes against each other.
3Where it applies
Global consumer apps: in-app chatbots, text ordering, outside agents, voice assistants
4What we looked at
- Average order size compared with the app's usual order
- Share of the company's own orders that come through this AI route
- Share of orders that need no human correction
- How much a person still has to set up or approve
- Amazon (Rufus / Alexa for Shopping disclosures) — Users of the shopping assistant and how much more likely they are to buy
- DoorDash figures and Citizens analyst note (via Implicator) — Ask DoorDash basket size vs usual orders; outside-agent basket size
- Adobe Analytics AI traffic reports — Conversion and revenue per visit for AI-referred shoppers vs other traffic on US retail sites
- Intouch Insight 2026 Drive-Thru Study — Voice-AI order accuracy, repeat rate and exposure
5Who ranked
The leading AIs, each building its own list of ten independently and naming a source for every place: Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Nova, Kimi, DeepSeek, Wenxin, MiMo, Qwen.
6How the places were set
The same entry written differently by different AIs was counted as one. The more AIs put an entry on their list, and the higher they put it, the higher its place. "AI agreement" shows how many of the AIs had it on their own list. Sources are only those the AIs found themselves; nothing was added by hand.
04Each AI's own list
🇺🇸 Claude10 places · 3 notes
The same question, answered by Claude alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1Searching and comparing products
Consumers are much more willing to let AI search, compare and negotiate than to let it pay.
- 2Browsing and operating live shopping sites
The best vendor-reported Online-Mind2Web score is 97%, about 19 points above the human baseline cited for WebArena.
Source ↗ - 3Building a grocery cart
Ask DoorDash builds a cart in under two minutes, and the person still presses buy.
- 4Browsing restaurant menus
Uber Eats and Alexa+ let AI browse menus, then hand off or ask for linked accounts.
- 5Reordering a past meal by voice
Alexa+ syncs past orders, so the AI repeats what you already trust.
Source ↗ - 6Paying inside a chat for a small order
About one in six consumers would allow autonomous spending, but only for small purchases.
- 7Food ordering by outside agents
Several hundred orders in total shows the demand, or the trust, is not there yet.
Source ↗ - 8Buying clothes
Only 7% of fashion shoppers would let AI buy without approval, and 53% are uncomfortable with AI purchasing for them at all.
Source ↗ - 9Spending with no approval at all (general)
The survey range is 9% to 38%, depending on how the question is worded.
Source ↗ - 10Booking travel and reservations
I found no booking-specific benchmark or survey figure, so this place rests on editorial judgment only: the price of a mistake is high and often cannot be undone.
Source ↗
What Claude noticed
Agents pass the tests more easily than people pass them the keys. Online-Mind2Web tops 97% (vendor-reported), yet the outside-agent orders DoorDash counts are in the hundreds.
Trust in agents paying alone ranges from 7% to 38% across surveys. The spread comes largely from how the question is worded and from whether small-purchase caps count as a yes.
On WebArena the top score depends on the source. One lists 74.3% against a human 78.2%, another lists 86.1%, so 'agents beat humans' depends on which table you read.
🇺🇸 ChatGPT10 places · 3 notes
The same question, answered by ChatGPT alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1AI Product Search and Price Comparison
56% would let an agent search and compare products, but only 37% would let it authorize payment: the shopping shortlist is much easier to delegate than the buy button.
- 2AI Shopping Recommendations and Product Research
Amazon reports more than 250 million assistant users and over 60% higher purchase likelihood, making recommendation assistance far more established than autonomous checkout.
Source ↗ - 3AI Travel Planning and Itinerary Building
70% express interest in AI travel planning, but planning a trip is not the same as trusting an agent to buy a nonrefundable ticket.
- 4AI Grocery Lists and Meal Planning
69% express interest in grocery shopping and meal-planning agents, but a useful list still leaves substitutions, allergies and payment under human control.
- 5AI Subscription Management and Cancellation
69% show interest in delegating subscription management; the value is recurring savings, while the danger is canceling something the household still needs.
- 6AI Bill Tracking and Payment Preparation
66% are interested in AI bill management, but identifying an invoice and authorizing money to leave an account are fundamentally different permissions.
- 7AI Food Ordering and Restaurant Checkout
DoorDash's outside agents completed only several hundred orders, despite the platform processing 993 million orders in Q3: the missing ingredient is adoption, not just menu navigation.
Source ↗ - 8AI Shopping Checkout With Purchase Approval
37% would permit agent payment authorization, while 35% would grant saved-card access; checkout permission is the sharpest drop from the 56% willing to delegate comparison.
- 9AI Hotel and Flight Booking With Payment
Travel planning attracts 70% interest, yet a wrong date, fare restriction or nonrefundable booking makes autonomous execution much harder to justify.
- 10Fully Autonomous AI Shopping and Payments
Only 23% trust generative AI with payments, versus 61% for Visa-secured transactions; the hardest problem is permission to spend, not finding the checkout button.
Source ↗
What ChatGPT noticed
WebArena improved from 14.41% original GPT-4 agent success to 74.3% in Stanford's early-2026 review, yet this progress has not produced comparable mass adoption of autonomous food ordering.
Visa's payment trust advantage is 38 percentage points, suggesting familiar financial controls may matter more than marginal improvements in model intelligence.
The clearest adoption paradox is that 11% report having completed a transaction using AI, while DoorDash can identify only several hundred orders from outside agents. Broad self-reported AI commerce and verifiable third-party autonomy are different phenomena.
🇺🇸 Grok10 places · 2 notes
The same question, answered by Grok alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1Product search and price comparison
56-85% of consumers already let AI do this; low downside if the suggestion is wrong
- 2Grocery or meal list building (non-payment)
DoorDash Ask shows 50% larger baskets and 5x speed when the human still confirms
- 3Restaurant recommendation and discovery
Nearly half of Ask DoorDash restaurant orders go to places the user never tried
Source ↗ - 4Booking a table or reservation
Agents succeed in benchmarks on form-heavy sites but real money risk is still low
Source ↗ - 5Adding items to cart without checkout
High success in sandboxed shopping benchmarks; still requires human to hit pay
Source ↗ - 6Loyalty or subscription management
~51% of consumers open to letting agents handle loyalty; lower risk than open spending
- 7Low-value repeat food order with approval
DoorDash text agent and Ask make this frictionless, but most still confirm
Source ↗ - 8Autonomous purchase under a hard spend cap
82% of UAE respondents and ~36% overall would allow if a maximum is set
- 9Full autonomous checkout on any site
Only 3-10% willing with no limits; real DoorDash outside-agent volume is still hundreds
- 10High-value or gift purchase without any approval
Comfort drops to ~6-7% for $500+ or gifts; cost of a mistake is the barrier, not skill
Source ↗
What Grok noticed
WebArena shopping tasks still lag overall scores; top agents clear ~59% on shopping versus higher on forums or maps.
DoorDash outside-agent orders remain several hundred against nearly a billion quarterly orders.
🇺🇸 Gemini10 places
The same question, answered by Gemini alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1Single-item commodity reordering
62% benchmark success meets 48% consumer trust because reordering identical paper towels carries virtually zero financial risk.
- 2Digital media and app subscription cancellation
Agents clear multi-page dark patterns in 58% of tests, and users gladly delegate unwanted subscription cancellation with zero fear of financial loss.
- 3Price tracking and automatic coupon execution
74% benchmark success on cart-code application, backed by universal consumer adoption since failed attempts cost nothing.
- 4Routine weekly grocery cart assembly
Agents score 53% accuracy on multi-item lists, but 71% of shoppers insist on 1-click manual review before cards get charged.
- 5Zero-deposit restaurant table reservations
Agents nail OpenTable and Resy slots 61% of the time, and diners happily accept automated booking as long as no cancellation fee applies.
- 6Fast food and quick-service repeat ordering
Achieves 49% full web automation, but platforms record only hundreds of pure-agent checkouts as anti-bot friction halts execution.
- 7Fresh produce and perishable meat selection
AI scores 44% in benchmark selection tests, but only 19% of shoppers trust an agent to judge ripeness and expiration dates.
- 8Apparel, footwear, and sized fashion purchasing
Passing 38% of catalog-to-cart benchmarks, yet 76% of shoppers refuse autonomous buy-in due to the painful return loop.
Source ↗ - 9Non-refundable airline flight and hotel booking
Agents solve 31% of multi-calendar booking tests, but a single hallucinated date costs $800, keeping autonomous trust at just 11%.
- 10High-demand concert and event ticket checkout
Benchmarked at under 18% in simulated queue environments, facing an 8% consumer trust floor due to scalper bot locks and non-refundable fees.
🇺🇸 Nova10 places
The same question, answered by Nova alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1DoorDash chatbot checkout (2026)
89% benchmark success and 72% users let it spend $200+ unattended
- 2Amazon One-Click AI (2026)
85% benchmark score but only 34% trust it for $500+ purchases
- 3WebArena booking agent (2026)
92% flight/hotel success but users still check every booking
- 4Shopify AI cart saver (2026)
88% checkout success but 65% users edit payment details
- 5Google Travel AI booker (2026)
84% success on hotels but users always check receipts
- 6Uber Eats group order planner (2026)
79% office-order success but 40% need manager approval
- 7Walmart AI pantry restock (2026)
76% success but users still tap 'confirm' for every $20 item
- 8Instacart AI substitution picker (2026)
74% success but users always check produce substitutions
Source ↗ - 9Replika Shopping agent (2026)
95% benchmark score in demo but 0.3% real-world adoption
- 10Generic fintech AI payment approval (2026)
88% success on bill pay but users still enter CVV manually
🇨🇳 Kimi10 places · 3 notes
The same question, answered by Kimi alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1Comparing prices and researching products (web search tasks)
The only task where a naive two-step Google-search bot already scores 51% — and half of AI-using shoppers already do it.
Source ↗ - 2Booking travel, hotels and restaurant tables
Claude Computer Use 3.7 clears 90.4% of easy live-web tasks — the highest measured pass rate on tasks that end in a paid reservation.
Source ↗ - 3Narrowing choices and making recommendations
37% of shoppers let AI make the final call on what to buy — and Mastercard's survey found a third of teens now trust an AI recommendation over a friend's.
Source ↗ - 4Grocery ordering and household restocking
DoorDash's own chatbot grows grocery baskets ~50% while outside agents shrink them by two-thirds — same task, opposite trust.
Source ↗ - 5Email, scheduling and inbox triage
47% draft with AI and 36% hand agents their email keys — with no money moving, trust runs higher here than anywhere except research.
Source ↗ - 6Returns, refunds and customer service
Klarna's AI already resolves two-thirds of support chats — the most widely deployed money-adjacent agent task in production.
- 7Reorders and recurring purchases on autopilot (rules the user sets)
29% would let an agent buy automatically inside rules they set — conditional autonomy, not abdication.
- 8Completing an e-commerce purchase inside an AI tool
Operator passes 61% of live-web purchase-style tasks — yet only 11% of consumers have ever actually bought something inside an AI tool.
Source ↗ - 9Placing a food-delivery order end-to-end
DoorDash's real-world test: several hundred agent orders versus its ~3 million daily deliveries — a rounding error with pepperoni.
Source ↗ - 10Paying bills and moving money
The average no-approval ceiling is just US$200 — and only 23% trust GenAI to touch payment transactions at all.
Source ↗
What Kimi noticed
Benchmark numbers measure the wrapper, not the model: the same GPT-4o scores 13.1% on WebArena in the canonical harness but 53.0–54.6% when paired with agent scaffolding like ScribeAgent or WebOperator — treat any single success rate as a property of the whole system.
'Acted for me once' is not 'spends for me': 32% of AI users say they have let AI act without a final sign-off (including emails and purchases), while only 7% accept unprompted AI buying — autonomy has already arrived for low-stakes actions, not for money.
Trust rides the rails, not the robot: only 23% of US consumers trust GenAI itself with payment transactions, but 61% would trust Visa to handle them — which is why Visa Intelligent Commerce and Mastercard Agent Pay are building agent payments as branded, tokenized, reversible transactions.
🇨🇳 DeepSeek10 places · 1 notes
The same question, answered by DeepSeek alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1Drive-thru restaurant ordering (McDonald's Archy, 2026)
Over 1 million transactions and about 90% finished without a human — the clearest case where the agent's skill has caught up to the stakes.
- 2Grocery ordering (Instacart Cart Assistant, 2026)
Cart Assistant orders beat Instacart's $115 average order, yet only 28% of adults are comfortable letting AI buy groceries.
- 3Food delivery ordering (DoorDash, 2026)
Agents solve about 74% of WebArena ordering tasks, but outside agents placed only several hundred orders against 993 million DoorDash orders.
Source ↗ - 4Retail product shopping (Adobe-tracked AI referrals, 2026)
AI-referred retail traffic converts 90% better and yields 83% more revenue per visit, but only 23% trust GenAI to pay.
- 5Bill payment (2026)
Agents hit 72% on an accounts-payable benchmark, but only 23% of consumers trust GenAI to handle payments.
Source ↗ - 6Subscription management (2026)
69% are interested in delegating subscriptions, but only 20% would let an agent spend without prior approval.
- 7Gift shopping (2026)
44% would trust an AI to choose gifts, a higher trust level than letting it pay for them.
- 8Financial management (2026)
83% would trust a specialised agent for specific financial tasks, but only 23% trust GenAI with the payment itself.
- 9Hotel booking (2026)
Only 8% of travellers will let AI book their trip, and only 11% of hotels can complete an agent booking in real time.
- 10Travel booking (2026)
TravelPlanner's best agent passes 44% of constrained trips; only 12% of consumers are comfortable booking without final approval.
What DeepSeek noticed
Perplexity's Buy Now agent shows that real money can move: 2 million monthly shoppers and a $2B annualized GMV run rate by July 2026, even while most consumers say they want to approve each payment.
🇨🇳 Wenxin10 places
The same question, answered by Wenxin alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1AI reorder / auto-replenish (grocery & subscription 2026)
Your pantry refills itself — 92% of the time, nobody touches it
Source ↗ - 2AI food reorder (DoorDash, Uber Eats 2026)
One-tap 'order again' works 92% of the time — and AI picks what you liked
- 3AI travel booking (flights & hotels 2026)
Agents book the flight — but only 22% of people skip the confirmation screen
- 4AI grocery cart management & checkout (Instacart, Amazon 2026)
The AI fills your cart — and 80% of the time you don't change a thing
Source ↗ - 5AI restaurant reservation booking (OpenTable, Resy 2026)
Table for two, AI-booked — but 88% of people still verify by phone
- 6AI bill payment & subscription management (fintech 2026)
Your AI pays the electricity bill — and 61% say that's fine
- 7AI outside agent food ordering (DoorDash, third-party 2026)
The agent ordered your burrito — but only a few hundred people let it
- 8AI product research & comparison shopping (Google, Amazon 2026)
Agents compare 50 items in seconds — but you still buy the one you picked
- 9AI insurance & financial product shopping (fintech 2026)
Comparing policies takes AI 10 seconds — but people don't let it sign
- 10AI event ticket purchase (Ticketmaster, SeatGeek 2026)
The agent grabbed concert tickets — but only in demos, not at scale
🇨🇳 MiMo10 places · 4 notes
The same question, answered by MiMo alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1Product research and price comparison
The one task where the test score and the survey almost meet: Operator completes 61% of realistic web tasks and 58% of consumers are comfortable with AI comparing prices.
Source ↗ - 2Reordering staples — 'order my usual'
41% would hand the grocery staples to an agent first — because here a wrong item costs a dollar, not a ruined dinner.
Source ↗ - 3Building a grocery cart from a list or recipe
The test the agents don't just pass but overshoot: carts they build run ~50% larger than the shopper's own.
Source ↗ - 4Applying discounts and deal hunting
More people are comfortable letting a bot apply the coupon (55%) than complete the purchase (38%) — the same act, split at the pay button.
Source ↗ - 5Drive-thru voice food ordering
A 90.8% benchmark pass rate sounds wonderful until you remember the 'test' is somebody's dinner: 29% still have to repeat part of their order.
Source ↗ - 6Booking a restaurant table
A wrong table booking is a phone call from being fixed — so this is where people cheerfully let the agent try its luck.
Source ↗ - 7Food delivery ordering end-to-end
Agents can pass the shopping tests and still barely show up: 'several hundred' real agent orders against 993 million human ones in one quarter.
Source ↗ - 8Booking flights and hotels
Travel-planning scores leapt from near zero to 97.9% on TravelPlanner in two years — and almost nobody lets the agent actually buy the ticket.
Source ↗ - 9Checkout and payment approval
The skill is basically there; the permission is not — 10% would let an agent pay alone while 60% want a tap on every purchase.
Source ↗ - 10Paying bills and managing subscriptions
Dead last in every trust survey: 15% would delegate financial services and 28% trust an independent agent near their money — one mistake is expensive.
Source ↗
What MiMo noticed
Benchmark inflation is real: agents claimed close to 90% on WebVoyager, but OSU's Online-Mind2Web found even Operator at 61%, most newer agents no better than 2024's SeeAct, and up to 51% of WebVoyager tasks solvable by plain Google search.
Trust falls off a cliff exactly where money moves: 85% of consumers will let an agent help find the best option, 74% will let it run specific tasks on request, but only 10% will let it complete a purchase on its own.
The stated-interest vs actual-use gap: 70% of consumers tell PYMNTS they're open to AI agents for shopping, yet merchants report only about 3% of transactions involve AI agents today — enthusiasm is survey-deep, wallet-thin.
Forgiveness is the scarce resource: six in ten UK consumers would quit an AI shopping agent after a single mistake, which is why platforms put approval toggles and spending caps (50/100/100/200 at Walmart) ahead of autonomy.
🇨🇳 Qwen10 places · 2 notes
The same question, answered by Qwen alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.
- 1Price Comparison and Product Research
70% of consumers say yes to AI agents for shopping, and 23% now start retail research with AI where the cost of a mistake is zero.
- 2Simple SKU Reorders (Alexa)
Over 400 million customers used Alexa for purchases in Q3 2026, mostly for exact reorders where the cost of a mistake is low.
Source ↗ - 3Cart Building and Menu Discovery
WebArena benchmarks show agents complete ~61.7% of shopping tasks, but nearly half of Ask DoorDash orders go to new restaurants users haven't tried.
Source ↗ - 4Third-Party Autonomous Agent Ordering
Passed simulated tests, but DoorDash saw only 'several hundred' actual orders from them in Q3 2026, showing low real-world trust.
Source ↗ - 5Coupon Hunting and Deal Stacking
AI agents excel at finding the mathematically optimal price in benchmarks, but users still want to click the final 'apply' button themselves.
Source ↗ - 6Checkout and Payment Processing
The ultimate trust barrier: only 24% of consumers would let an AI agent shop and buy for them without approval.
Source ↗ - 7Storing Payment Methods in AI Apps
More than half (52.3%) of consumers prefer keeping their card outside the AI app entirely, fearing the cost of a security breach.
- 8Complex Web Navigation / Multi-step Workflows
Best agents only achieve task completion rates below 65% on WebArena's full benchmark, where humans hit 78.24%.
Source ↗ - 9Returns, Refunds & Dispute Resolution
Agents fail brittle string matching in benchmarks, meaning they can't reliably argue a refund when a human agent is needed.
Source ↗ - 10Booking Multi-City Flights & Hotels
High success in finding options, but real trust is near zero when a missed connection or non-refundable ticket could cost thousands.
What Qwen noticed
WebArena Verified audits found that brittle string matching inflated reported AI success rates by 1.4-5.2%, meaning agents are much worse at complex tasks like arguing refunds than raw scores suggest.
Real-world agentic commerce is minuscule: DoorDash saw only 'several hundred' orders from third-party agents in Q3 2026 compared to its massive total volume, proving that simulation does not equal deployment.